How to choose the right capital for flips, rentals, ground‑up, and everything in between
Estimated read time: 15–20 minutes. Grab coffee. Maybe two.
TL;DR (but definitely read the rest)
- Hard money = fastest, often local, usually the highest cost, least paperwork, and the broadest tolerance for messy deals. Great for tight timelines and hairy rehabs, but not for long-term holds.
- Private money (individuals/club) = relationship-driven and highly variable on cost and professionalism. Can be clutch, but may be capital‑limited and unreliable for scale.
- Institutional private lenders (like American Heritage Lending) = built for investors; reliable capital from funds/REITs/securitizations, consistent guidelines, competitive rates vs. hard money, more flexible than banks, and generally deal‑savvy. A little more paperwork than hard money, much less than banks.
- Banks/Credit Unions = lowest rates in the best cases, but most documentation, longest timelines, and conventional underwriting. Excellent for stabilized assets, less ideal for speed, value‑add construction, or unconventional borrowers.
If your deal is speed + complexity → start with hard money or institutional private money. If your deal is stabilized + patient timeline → look at banks/CUs. If your deal is relationship‑based and small → private money might work—just plan for a back‑up.
Why this matters
Capital is your most expensive building material. Choosing the wrong lender can turn a profitable flip into a break‑even—or worse, an expensive seminar. Choosing the right one can smooth draws, de‑risk the close, and let your crew focus on what they do best: turning ugly ducklings into cash‑flowing swans.
At American Heritage Lending (AHL), we sit in the institutional private lane. We’re biased about the advantages of that lane (hey, we’re human), but we also cut deals alongside hard money players, private lenders, and banks every day. Consider this your field guide—and yes, we’ll keep the jargon to a minimum and the checklists to a maximum.
Definitions at a glance
Hard Money Lenders
Small to midsize lenders—often local or regional—who specialize in speed and collateral‑based decisions. Expect higher rates and fees, light documentation, and willingness to fund complex rehabs. Typical focus: short‑term bridge for flips or value‑add plays. Long‑term take‑outs usually happen elsewhere.
Private Lenders (Individuals/Groups)
Individuals, family offices, or small pools that lend relationship‑based capital. Costs and professionalism vary widely. Advantages can include personalized terms and quick decisions; risks include limited capital, inconsistent processes, and little appetite for long‑term holds or complex construction oversight.
Institutional Private Lenders (Like AHL)
Purpose‑built for real estate investors, typically backed by funds, REITs, capital partners, private equity, and/or securitizations. Expect reliable capital, clear guidelines, faster timelines than banks, more paperwork than hard money, but less than banks, and competitive rates for the speed/structure offered. Products often include fix‑and‑flip, DSCR rental loans, bridge‑to‑perm, portfolio loans, and ground‑up.
Banks & Credit Unions
Traditional depository institutions with the lowest cost of capital and the highest regulatory overhead. Expect more documentation, longer underwriting, and conservative risk views. Great for stabilized, well‑documented income properties with patient timelines. Less comfortable with spec construction, unusual borrower profiles, or quick closes.
How the money is actually sourced
Follow the capital, and you’ll understand the underwriting.
Capital supply chain at a glance
- Hard Money: Proprietary balance sheets or warehouse lines from niche finance shops. Capital can be nimble but finite. When pipelines are full, terms tighten, leverage trims, and extension fees loom.
- Private Money: An individual’s savings, a family trust, or a small group’s pooled funds. Terms depend on relationship, perceived risk, and their opportunity cost. If they decide to buy a boat instead, your term sheet might change.
- Institutional Private: Capital is raised from institutional investors (funds/REITs/PE) and/or via securitizations. That supports consistency, scale, and product breadth—and usually better secondary‑market execution for standardized programs (e.g., DSCR).
- Banks/CUs: Core deposits and wholesale funding, governed by banking regulators. The cheapest money, but also the most rule‑bound.
Pricing 101: cost of funds → your rate
- Hard Money: Priced off a lender’s own hurdle rate and/or warehouse cost of funds (often a floating reference rate + spread) plus risk premium. Revenue blend: origination points + rate + fees. Translation: faster decisions and lighter docs usually cost more.
- Private Money: Priced off the lender’s personal opportunity cost (what they could earn elsewhere) and perceived risk/relationship. You can sometimes “negotiate the story,” but pricing may drift deal‑to‑deal.
- Institutional Private: Priced off aggregator cost of capital (warehouse + securitization/forward take‑out + servicer/hedge costs). This is why programs have published guidelines—eligibility drives execution, which drives rate.
- Banks/CUs: Priced off cost of deposits/wholesale funding and risk‑weighted capital requirements. Lowest structural cost → lowest potential rates, but only if your deal fits policy and you can clear the documentation bar.
Liquidity & reliability (what happens in real markets)
- Hard Money: Liquidity is as deep as the lender’s balance sheet/lines. In hot markets they may hit concentration limits (too many loans in one geography or sponsor), leading to paused approvals or lower leverage.
- Private Money: Liquidity is personal. A large loss, a different investment, or just caution can shrink capacity mid‑project. Great for one‑off wins; risky as your only fuel source.
- Institutional Private: Liquidity benefits from diverse capital partners and repeat securitizations. If one outlet slows, others may remain open. Investors expect consistent servicing, construction controls, and data, which is why processes matter.
- Banks/CUs: Liquidity is durable but policy‑driven. Economic/regulatory shifts (e.g., credit exams, portfolio caps, risk‑weight changes) can tighten credit boxes fast, even if your individual deal looks fine.
Why paperwork maps to capital source
Where capital is pooled or regulated, documentation must prove salability and safety. Appraisals follow standards, leases must tie to bank statements, draws need inspections. That’s not bureaucracy for its own sake—it’s the price of stable, scalable money.
Cycle watch: how lender behavior shifts across market conditions
Markets move, and when they do, cost of funds and risk appetite shift differently across lender types. Here’s how the main scenarios usually play out, and what to do about them.
Volatility spikes and spreads widen. When credit spreads gap out, warehouse and securitization costs jump and secondary buyers get picky. Hard money responds first with higher rates or points and modest leverage trims, often tightening ARV haircuts on flips. Private money grows selective and may cap exposure to a borrower or market—sometimes re‑pricing late in the process. Institutional private lenders narrow eligibility, lower leverage, and require stronger DSCR and interest reserves, while prioritizing repeat sponsors who execute cleanly. Banks add conditions, slow committees, and scrutinize global cash flow and recourse more closely. For borrowers, assume 25–50 bps of movement, negotiate extension provisions on day one, and accelerate third‑party reports so you can still close while markets are choppy.
Rates fall and the tone turns risk‑on. As benchmarks drop, appetites improve but floors and prepayment terms can blunt savings. Hard money may trim rate modestly yet hold points and structure; private money becomes more flexible on price and scope. Institutional private lenders expand product availability and LTVs within well‑telegraphed guardrails, and DSCR locks move faster; banks re‑enter stabilized deals with the best nominal pricing. Your play is to check floor language and step‑downs, weigh refinance versus recast, and consider terming out DSCR debt before renewed competition compresses spreads again.
Inflation surprises or hikes come fast. Debt service can jump faster than rents, compressing DSCR while appraisals and rent‑growth assumptions turn conservative. Hard money shortens terms, raises floors, and reduces LTC; private money pauses originations or shrinks check sizes; institutional private lowers leverage, raises interest‑reserve requirements, and tightens DSCR; banks nudge toward more recourse and slower approvals. Re‑underwrite at +100–150 bps, budget interest reserves, lock construction timelines early, and line up a fixed‑rate take‑out option while you still can.
The securitization window softens or pauses. When bond buyers step back, long‑term DSCR executions are hardest to place. Hard money is largely unaffected unless warehouse lines tighten; private money is unchanged but capacity‑limited and highly selective. Institutional private prioritizes bridge loans it can hold on balance sheet, widens DSCR spreads, and slows take‑outs; banks keep lending but may re-trade price and add conditions. Borrowers should pivot to bridge‑to‑perm plans, expect longer locks and wider DSCR spreads, and favor lenders who can hold loans if take‑outs slip.
Regional bank stress or regulatory tightening. Examiners cap CRE concentrations and committees grow conservative. Hard money and institutional private lenders pick up share as nonbank channels move faster; private money fills small gaps at a premium. Banks lower LTVs, add covenants, extend timelines, and require more recourse. Keep your personal financial statement and tax returns current, be prepared for partial/full recourse, and use nonbank bridge capital for acquisitions with a bank refi post‑stabilization.
Housing slows and prices soften. Days on market lengthen, resale risk rises, and appraisers apply larger adjustments and longer lookbacks. Hard money shaves ARV and leverage, demanding more equity; private money becomes highly selective on flips and prefers light rehabs; institutional private emphasizes lower leverage, tighter budgets, and closer draw oversight; banks lean on in‑place income and conservative comps. Underwrite ARV with a 5–10% haircut, add 10–15% contingency, plan for longer carry, and line up alternate exits such as wholetail or lease‑option strategies.
Insurance tightens after catastrophes. Premiums and deductibles jump as carriers exit certain zip codes or add exclusions. Hard money requires stronger coverage and may add holdbacks; private money can balk without proof of bindable coverage; institutional private enforces tighter standards, higher reserves, and earlier binding; banks delay closings until coverage is locked and endorsements are in. Engage a broker early, bind before closing when possible, budget higher premiums and deductibles in DSCR math, and keep cash for named‑storm or wildfire deductibles.
Across all cycles, the constant is the same: price the whole capital stack, lock milestones and extensions early, and preserve optionality. The checklist below distills those moves so you can act quickly when conditions change.
What this means for you
- Ask about capitalization: “Balance sheet? Warehouse? Securitized? Deposits?” You’re really asking, “How reliable is your money if the market wobbles?”
- Confirm the take‑out: If your exit is DSCR or bank perm, choose a source aligned to that path.
- Mind the covenants: Warehouse or regulatory covenants can limit leverage, geographies, or borrower types. Don’t be surprised—ask upfront.
- Price the whole stack: Rate + points + draws + extensions + required reserves. Capital that shows up on time is often cheaper in real life than a teaser rate.
- Have plan B capital: Especially if using private money or a single hard money shop. Optionality is an asset.
- Lock timelines and extensions early: Know doc deadlines, appraisal turn-times, and extension fees before you waive contingencies.
- Order third‑party reports on Day 1: Appraisal, BPO, insurance, and title—compress the critical path to reduce market‑move risk.
- Stress‑test DSCR/ARV: Underwrite rent downside, expense upside, and cap‑rate expansion; ensure your deal still pencils with a modest shock.
- Pre‑clear draw mechanics: Who inspects, how long it takes, fees, retainage, and how change orders work—so construction doesn’t starve for cash.
- Over‑reserve: Budget interest carry, contingency, and tax/insurance escrows; cash solves timing surprises better than hope.
- Diversify counterparties: Keep at least two active relationships across lender types to avoid single‑point‑of‑failure risk.
- Document like a pro: Maintain a clean data room (entity docs, scope, budget, photos, leases). Organized sponsors close first.
Pro tip questions for any lender
- What’s your primary capital source for this program?
- Do you hold or sell/securitize these loans after closing?
- What are the common reasons leverage or pricing changes between term sheet and CTC?
- How do you handle construction draws and typical timelines?
- What happens if the market shifts mid‑project—do you still fund approved draws/extensions?
Underwriting DNA: who says “yes” and why
When a lender decides, they’re triangulating four things: the asset (what it is today and what it can be), the sponsor (experience, liquidity, credit), the plan (scope, timeline, exit), and the paper trail (can they defend this loan to their investors, warehouse bank, regulators, or investment committee). Each lender type weights those inputs differently, and that weighting explains both their speed and their asks.
Hard Money. Asset‑centric with a sharp eye on the exit. The core questions are: What is my downside if I have to take this back? How quickly can the borrower create value? Underwriting leans on LTV/LTC, current and ARV, the contractor scope and capacity, and the borrower’s recent track record on similar projects. Credit scores and tax returns matter less than proof you can execute and enough liquidity to carry the project. Conditions to close are practical (entity docs, insurance, budget, appraisal/BPO, title), and recourse is common. Draws are designed for speed, so lenders expect tight scopes, photo evidence, and quick inspections. What moves the needle: a GC who’s built this exact scope before, a realistic timeline with contingency, and comps that support ARV without heroics. Red flags: optimistic budgets, thin liquidity, or novelty construction methods that can blow timelines.
Private Money. Relationship‑centric and often character‑based. The lender may weigh your reputation and prior interactions more heavily than formal models. They can accept informal valuations or a broker price opinion and may skip deep income verification if they trust you. That flexibility is a double‑edged sword: it speeds approvals but can create ambiguity around draws, extensions, or change orders. Expect simple notes and deeds, sometimes balloons, and pricing that reflects the lender’s opportunity cost and comfort level. What moves the needle: a clear, concise one‑pager (purchase price, scope, timeline, exit), frequent updates, and demonstrated skin in the game. Watch‑outs: capacity limits (can they fund deal #2 and #3?) and terms that drift near closing because assumptions weren’t written down.
Institutional Private (like AHL). The same deal logic as hard money—does the plan pencil and can the team execute?—but layered with institutional discipline so the loan can be financed, sold, or securitized reliably. For rentals, that means documented income or DSCR; for bridge/construction, it means funds control, third‑party inspections, and consistent appraisals. Title/insurance standards match capital‑partner requirements. Recourse varies by program , and you’ll see interest reserves or completion holdbacks sized to the plan. Experience is scored (e.g., recent flips or doors owned), and post‑close liquidity is verified so projects don’t stall. What moves the needle: clean, well‑organized docs; realistic budgets with bids; evidence of rent support; and early alignment on exit (sale, DSCR take‑out, or bank refi). Payoff: speed + repeatability. Slightly more paperwork than hard money, far less than a bank.
Banks/Credit Unions. Conventional, policy‑driven credit. The model centers on verified, stabilized cash flow and the borrower’s global ability to repay, supported by tax returns, financial statements, liquidity tests, and experience. Pro formas help, but banks prefer in‑place income or highly certain leases; they’re cautious with heavy rehabs, spec construction, or unconventional borrowers. Expect fuller documentation (multi‑year returns, K‑1s, personal financial statements), more third‑party work (environmental, full appraisals), and longer committees. Recourse is common; covenants and seasoning requirements may apply before cash flows “count.” What moves the needle: strong guarantor liquidity, conservative leverage, stabilized DSCR with documented expenses, and patient timelines. Trade‑off: often the lowest rate, but at the cost of time and flexibility.
Quick compare: how each underwrites the three pillars:
- Asset: Hard/Institutional are comfortable with transition and ARV (with evidence); Private relies on common sense and comps; Banks want stabilized value and conservative appraisals.
- Sponsor: Hard/Institutional value relevant experience + liquidity; Private values trust + history; Banks analyze global cash flow, credit depth, and liquidity.
- Plan/Exit: Hard/Institutional fund to a clear scope, draw plan, and exit (sale or DSCR/bank refi); Private may accept a simpler plan if trust is high; Banks prefer already‑stabilized or highly certain business plans.
Bottom line: if your deal is complex or time‑bound, choose a lender whose weighting aligns with execution risk and timeline. If your asset is stabilized and you can document every line item, conventional credit will reward you with price…eventually.
Speed, certainty, flexibility, and cost side‑by‑side
Rule of thumb: You can optimize for two—speed, flexibility, or price. Getting all three is usually a unicorn sighting.
| Dimension | Hard Money | Private Lenders | Institutional Private (AHL) | Banks/CUs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed to Term Sheet | Hours to 1–2 days | Minutes to a day | Same day to 2 days | Days to weeks |
| Closing Timeline | 3–10 business days | 1–7 days (varies wildly) | 10–15 business days typical | 45–60+ days |
| Cost (Rate/Fees) | Highest | Varies (mid‑high) | Mid (below hard money, above banks) | Lowest |
| Leverage | Competitive for rehabs | Depends on relationship | Competitive across programs | Conservative |
| Paperwork | Light | Light to medium | Medium (streamlined investor docs) | Heavy |
| Flexibility | High on asset quirks | Depends on relationship | High within published guardrails | Lowest |
| Capital Reliability | Good but finite | Can be limited | High, built for scale | Very high |
| Best For | Speed + complexity | Small, relationship deals | Scalable investor strategy | Stabilized, patient deals |
Your mileage will vary by market, sponsor, and product. Use this as a directional compass, not an iron law.
Paperwork: what to expect (and why it matters)
Paperwork is not a personality test; it’s a proxy for how your lender manages risk and capital partners.
- Hard Money: ID, entity docs, a budget, contractor info, appraisal/BPO, title/insurance. It’s the “weekend warrior” documentation set. Good enough to build a deck, not a stadium.
- Private Lenders: Similar to hard money, sometimes lighter. May waive formal appraisals, which can be great… unless you need a refi appraisal later.
- Institutional Private: Adds more verifiable documentation (e.g., standardized appraisals, rent comps, DSCR analysis, construction controls). Enough rigor to keep capital lines open, without asking for your childhood report cards.
- Banks/CUs: Everything above, plus tax returns, bank statements, global cashflow models, liquidity verification, and sometimes post‑closing covenants.
Pro tip: organized borrowers close faster everywhere. Even hard money lenders prefer borrowers who can send a clean Dropbox link instead of 37 forwards titled “FINAL_final_V8.pdf.”
Draws, construction, and GCs
Construction risk makes underwriters break out in hives. The draw process is where that risk is managed day‑to‑day and where your cash conversion cycle lives or dies. In practice, every lender is trying to validate three things before releasing funds: (1) work in place matches the approved scope and budget, (2) materials are on site or paid as allowed, and (3) there’s still enough money/time to finish the job. Here’s how the approaches differ, plus how AHL speeds it up.
- Hard Money: Often built for speed, with leaner draw oversight and simpler evidence standards (photos, invoices, quick inspector walkthroughs). That cuts friction, but it also puts more on you to police scope creep and keep documentation clean so the next draw isn’t delayed. Expect fewer line‑items in the Scope Of Work (SOW), more reliance on the GC’s attestation, and occasional over‑advance risk if scopes shift mid‑stream. Best practice: align milestones to logical, inspectable chunks (e.g., rough‑in complete, windows installed, roof dried‑in) and label photos by SOW line.
-
Private Lenders: Processes range from informal photo‑based draws to “call me when the tile’s in.” That works when trust is high and budgets are small, but the very informality that speeds things up can cause misaligned expectations around percentage complete, retainage, or change orders. You can professionalize the experience by sending a one‑page draw packet (SOW line‑items requested, before/after photos, invoices, lien waivers) so everyone’s on the same page.
- Institutional Private Lenders (like AHL): Purpose‑built for repeatable execution. You’ll see funds control, third‑party validations, and clear draw schedules tied to the approved budget. That structure keeps capital partners comfortable—and keeps projects moving—if it’s efficient. At AHL we’ve invested in workflow so the oversight doesn’t become overhead.AHL’s digital draw inspections. To speed releases and reduce cost, AHL offers digital draw inspections across many programs: your borrower or GC submits time‑stamped photos and short videos of completed work from the jobsite (geo‑tagged where available) through a secure link. Our reviewers compare the media to the SOW line‑items, permit/inspection status, and other applicable information. Digital validation often cuts scheduling lag, reduces trip fees, and keeps crews funded. Practical tips that speed approvals:
- Capture wide + detail shots (room‑level and close‑ups), keep the camera horizontal, and pan slowly in videos.
- Label uploads by SOW code (e.g., 2.3 – Rough plumbing – 100%), and include before/after where relevant.
- Attach supporting docs (invoices, delivery tickets for big materials, subcontractor lien waivers if required, updated schedule if timelines shift).
- Note any change orders explicitly and get them pre‑approved before requesting funds.
-
Banks/CUs: The most structured. Expect rigid inspections (often third‑party), retainage, conservative contingency requirements, and calendar‑based draw cycles (e.g., monthly). Paperwork can include AIA G‑series forms, inspector sign‑offs, conditional/unconditional lien waivers, and proof of in‑place insurance and permits. It’s thorough and predictable. Great for large, well‑documented projects once stabilized but slower when you’re turning units or pushing a tight timeline.
Typical draw anatomy (what happens under the hood): submit draw package → funds control verifies documents and math → inspector (digital or in‑person) validates percent complete → lender approves release (adjusting for retainage/holds) → wire initiated. Delays usually trace back to mismatched SOV math, unlabeled media, missing waivers, or unapproved change orders.
Contractor‑friendly pro tips: build a realistic SOW upfront; avoid 40 micro‑lines for items no one can verify; keep contingency separate; upload permits/inspection cards as they’re signed; maintain a shared folder with date‑stamped photo sets; and always submit COIs/W‑9s and lien waivers with each draw to keep title clean (even if your lender doesn’t require it).
Exit strategies and refi‑ability
Lenders love exits the way pilots love runways.
- Hard Money: Assumes exit via sale or refi once stabilized. Rarely provides the perm take‑out.
- Private Lenders: Similar assumption; may extend short‑term, but not a long‑term home.
- Institutional Private: Often offers both the bridge and the DSCR take‑out (or has partners who do). That reduces transaction friction.
- Banks/CUs: Excellent long‑term home once the asset qualifies; not your sprint partner to get it stabilized.
Portfolio scale and capital reliability
Scaling from 3 to 30 doors—or from 1 to 10 projects in flight—requires reliable capital.
- Hard Money: Can scale, but lender concentration risk is real; limits may cap your growth during hot cycles.
- Private Lenders: Relationship‑dependent and capacity‑limited. Great as a supplemental tool; risky as your only tool.
- Institutional Private: Designed for volume and repeat borrowers. Consistency across markets matters when your acquisitions team turns into a deal machine.
- Banks/CUs: Infinite in theory; limited in practice by debt yield, global cash flow, and portfolio concentrations.
Common pitfalls by lender type
Hard Money
- Underestimating the total cost of capital (fees + points + interest carry + extension fees)
- Assuming every lender draws the same way; read the draw guide
- Stretching leverage on rosy ARV assumptions
Private Money
- A handshake is not a term sheet; memorialize the deal
- The “friend discount” that wasn’t; price can drift last‑minute
- Lender runs out of dry powder mid‑project
Institutional Private
- Borrowers assume it’s bank‑level red tape; it’s not, but there are standards
- Waiting to order third‑party reports → timeline crunch
- Not leveraging bridge‑to‑perm options early enough
Banks/CUs
- Underestimating the timeline and conditions list
- Trying to force a value‑add into stabilized-only credit boxes
- Missing the seasoning/DSCR tests by a whisker because of rents or expenses not documented
Scenario planner: Flip, BRRRR, DSCR rental, and ground‑up
Let’s run a few real‑world plays.
1) Classic Fix‑and‑Flip
- Profile: Auction purchase, needs $120k in rehab, resale in 6 months.
- Best capital: Institutional private or hard money. You need speed, draws, and a lender that won’t faint at knob‑and‑tube wiring.
- Watch‑outs: Don’t chase max leverage if it inflates fees and monthly carry. Better to close on time with slightly less LTC than to win the leverage trophy and lose the weekend to extension fees.
- Upgrade: If you’re scaling (multiple flips), the institutional private route gives you consistency across markets and appraisers.
2) BRRRR (Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat)
- Profile: Light to medium rehab, planning a DSCR refi take‑out in 4–8 months.
- Best capital: Institutional private that offers both bridge and DSCR. You want one playbook, one portal, one draw team.
- Watch‑outs: Make sure your DSCR math is conservative. Plug realistic rents and all‑in expenses (taxes, insurance, HOA, maintenance, management). If your DSCR is 1.00x on a good day, your refi is a maybe, not a plan.
- Upgrade: Use AHL’s DSCR calculator to sanity‑check the take‑out before you even swing a hammer.
3) DSCR Rental Purchase (No Rehab)
- Profile: Stabilized SFR or small multifamily, solid rents, you want to close in 3 weeks.
- Best capital: Institutional private DSCR program for speed + documentation that still feels sane.
- Bank option: If you have time and love paperwork, banks/CUs can price lower. But set expectations with your seller.
4) Ground‑Up Construction (SFR/Small Infill)
- Profile: Entitled lot, budgeted build, reputable GC, sale on exit.
- Best capital: Institutional private or select hard money. You need real funds control, staged inspections, and a draw team that knows sheathing from shingles.
- Bank option: Some banks fund construction, but typically with heavy oversight, longer timelines, and post‑closing requirements.
5) Small Value‑Add Multifamily
- Profile: 12‑unit with upside through unit turns and RUBS.
- Best capital: Institutional private bridge to DSCR or agency/small‑balance take‑out depending on business plan.
- Bank option: Strong—after stabilization. Not ideal at acquisition if timeline is tight.
Final thoughts
Real estate is the art of persuading a building to be worth more tomorrow than it is today. Lenders are the friends who front you cash to prove it. Hard money is the friend with a fast car and a loose schedule. Private money is the friend who trusts you but sometimes forgets their wallet. Institutional private is the friend who shows up on time with a spreadsheet and snacks. Banks are the friend who will absolutely help you move… in six to eight weeks, after you submit proof you own furniture.
There’s no single “best” lender type; only the best fit for this deal, at this moment, in your strategy. If you value speed with professional process, options for DSCR take‑outs, and capital you can scale with, the institutional private lane is built for you. That’s the AHL lane. And we’d love to be part of your next win.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What’s the real difference between “hard money” and “institutional private money”?
The playbook looks similar—bridge loans, rehab focus, construction draws—but the capital base and consistency differ. Institutional private lenders (like AHL) run programmatic capital with standardized guidelines, experienced ops, and scale. That often delivers better reliability, broader product options (e.g., DSCR), and smoother execution at a price point between hard money and banks.
Q: When are banks actually the best option?
When the asset is stabilized, documentation is immaculate, and your timeline is patient. If you want the lowest rate and can tolerate the process, banks can be fantastic.
Q: I have a private lender who says they’ll fund anything. Should I just use them?
If the relationship is solid and they’ve shown up in past closings, great. But always validate capacity (can they fund your next three deals?) and paper the terms. And have a Plan B if the fishing trip runs long.
Q: Do institutional private lenders only care about the property?
We care about both property, plan, and enough about the borrower to be confident you can execute. Our underwriting is built to satisfy both deal logic and capital partners without turning it into a dissertation.
Q: Can I BRRRR with hard money and refi with a bank?
Yes. Many do. Just be sure your rehab scope, rent targets, and DSCR are bank‑friendly, and that you understand seasoning requirements.
Q: Why do some lenders ask for more documents than others?
It’s about who they answer to. Lenders with regulators and securitization investors must document to standard. Others can be flexible, but that flexibility can limit your future refi options.
Q: How do I compare offers apples‑to‑apples?
Compute total cost of capital: points + fees + interest carry + extensions + required reserves + draw fees. Then weigh speed/certainty against price. The cheapest quoted rate can be the most expensive close.
Glossary
-
ARV (After‑Repair Value): Estimated value post‑renovation.
-
DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio): Net operating income divided by annual debt service; a measure of coverage for loans.
-
LTC/LTV: Loan‑to‑Cost/Loan‑to‑Value.
-
Funds Control: Third‑party management of construction draws.
-
Bridge‑to‑Perm: Short‑term bridge loan converting to long‑term permanent financing.
-
Seasoning: Required time period before a refi is permitted or before income counts as stabilized.